summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTobias Markmann <tm@ayena.de>2017-01-10 20:22:26 (GMT)
committerTobias Markmann <tm@ayena.de>2017-01-11 18:23:48 (GMT)
commit3b0cde2e6dbf26a01a59b0004e4041199731cbc8 (patch)
tree0b2ba6addb161f1d3e437a64685ea797341a149b /3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googletest/docs/V1_7_PumpManual.md
parenta0c339f80e4585341179edef1898defd21a0d36a (diff)
downloadswift-3b0cde2e6dbf26a01a59b0004e4041199731cbc8.zip
swift-3b0cde2e6dbf26a01a59b0004e4041199731cbc8.tar.bz2
Integrate googletest and googlemock libraries to 3rdParty
googletest and googlemock from release 1.8.0 have been copied to the 3rdParty folder. With this commit tests for Swift project can also written using googletest and googlemock APIs. The test runners will execute test suites written to either test library. Passing —-xml to a test runner will now create two test report XML files, namely $programName-report.cppunit.xml and $programName-report.gtest.xml. The ByteArrayTest has been converted to use googletest instead of googlemock to serve as an example and test the integration. Test-Information: Build all tests via ‘./scons test=all’ and verified all tests are run. Build all tests via ‘./scons test=all checker_report=1’ and verified that two report XML files are generated per test runner executed. Change-Id: I81a9fb2c7ea5612fc1b34eef70ed7e711bfeea81
Diffstat (limited to '3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googletest/docs/V1_7_PumpManual.md')
-rw-r--r--3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googletest/docs/V1_7_PumpManual.md177
1 files changed, 177 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googletest/docs/V1_7_PumpManual.md b/3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googletest/docs/V1_7_PumpManual.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8184f15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googletest/docs/V1_7_PumpManual.md
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+
+
+<b>P</b>ump is <b>U</b>seful for <b>M</b>eta <b>P</b>rogramming.
+
+# The Problem #
+
+Template and macro libraries often need to define many classes,
+functions, or macros that vary only (or almost only) in the number of
+arguments they take. It's a lot of repetitive, mechanical, and
+error-prone work.
+
+Variadic templates and variadic macros can alleviate the problem.
+However, while both are being considered by the C++ committee, neither
+is in the standard yet or widely supported by compilers. Thus they
+are often not a good choice, especially when your code needs to be
+portable. And their capabilities are still limited.
+
+As a result, authors of such libraries often have to write scripts to
+generate their implementation. However, our experience is that it's
+tedious to write such scripts, which tend to reflect the structure of
+the generated code poorly and are often hard to read and edit. For
+example, a small change needed in the generated code may require some
+non-intuitive, non-trivial changes in the script. This is especially
+painful when experimenting with the code.
+
+# Our Solution #
+
+Pump (for Pump is Useful for Meta Programming, Pretty Useful for Meta
+Programming, or Practical Utility for Meta Programming, whichever you
+prefer) is a simple meta-programming tool for C++. The idea is that a
+programmer writes a `foo.pump` file which contains C++ code plus meta
+code that manipulates the C++ code. The meta code can handle
+iterations over a range, nested iterations, local meta variable
+definitions, simple arithmetic, and conditional expressions. You can
+view it as a small Domain-Specific Language. The meta language is
+designed to be non-intrusive (s.t. it won't confuse Emacs' C++ mode,
+for example) and concise, making Pump code intuitive and easy to
+maintain.
+
+## Highlights ##
+
+ * The implementation is in a single Python script and thus ultra portable: no build or installation is needed and it works cross platforms.
+ * Pump tries to be smart with respect to [Google's style guide](http://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/): it breaks long lines (easy to have when they are generated) at acceptable places to fit within 80 columns and indent the continuation lines correctly.
+ * The format is human-readable and more concise than XML.
+ * The format works relatively well with Emacs' C++ mode.
+
+## Examples ##
+
+The following Pump code (where meta keywords start with `$`, `[[` and `]]` are meta brackets, and `$$` starts a meta comment that ends with the line):
+
+```
+$var n = 3 $$ Defines a meta variable n.
+$range i 0..n $$ Declares the range of meta iterator i (inclusive).
+$for i [[
+ $$ Meta loop.
+// Foo$i does blah for $i-ary predicates.
+$range j 1..i
+template <size_t N $for j [[, typename A$j]]>
+class Foo$i {
+$if i == 0 [[
+ blah a;
+]] $elif i <= 2 [[
+ blah b;
+]] $else [[
+ blah c;
+]]
+};
+
+]]
+```
+
+will be translated by the Pump compiler to:
+
+```
+// Foo0 does blah for 0-ary predicates.
+template <size_t N>
+class Foo0 {
+ blah a;
+};
+
+// Foo1 does blah for 1-ary predicates.
+template <size_t N, typename A1>
+class Foo1 {
+ blah b;
+};
+
+// Foo2 does blah for 2-ary predicates.
+template <size_t N, typename A1, typename A2>
+class Foo2 {
+ blah b;
+};
+
+// Foo3 does blah for 3-ary predicates.
+template <size_t N, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3>
+class Foo3 {
+ blah c;
+};
+```
+
+In another example,
+
+```
+$range i 1..n
+Func($for i + [[a$i]]);
+$$ The text between i and [[ is the separator between iterations.
+```
+
+will generate one of the following lines (without the comments), depending on the value of `n`:
+
+```
+Func(); // If n is 0.
+Func(a1); // If n is 1.
+Func(a1 + a2); // If n is 2.
+Func(a1 + a2 + a3); // If n is 3.
+// And so on...
+```
+
+## Constructs ##
+
+We support the following meta programming constructs:
+
+| `$var id = exp` | Defines a named constant value. `$id` is valid util the end of the current meta lexical block. |
+|:----------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| `$range id exp..exp` | Sets the range of an iteration variable, which can be reused in multiple loops later. |
+| `$for id sep [[ code ]]` | Iteration. The range of `id` must have been defined earlier. `$id` is valid in `code`. |
+| `$($)` | Generates a single `$` character. |
+| `$id` | Value of the named constant or iteration variable. |
+| `$(exp)` | Value of the expression. |
+| `$if exp [[ code ]] else_branch` | Conditional. |
+| `[[ code ]]` | Meta lexical block. |
+| `cpp_code` | Raw C++ code. |
+| `$$ comment` | Meta comment. |
+
+**Note:** To give the user some freedom in formatting the Pump source
+code, Pump ignores a new-line character if it's right after `$for foo`
+or next to `[[` or `]]`. Without this rule you'll often be forced to write
+very long lines to get the desired output. Therefore sometimes you may
+need to insert an extra new-line in such places for a new-line to show
+up in your output.
+
+## Grammar ##
+
+```
+code ::= atomic_code*
+atomic_code ::= $var id = exp
+ | $var id = [[ code ]]
+ | $range id exp..exp
+ | $for id sep [[ code ]]
+ | $($)
+ | $id
+ | $(exp)
+ | $if exp [[ code ]] else_branch
+ | [[ code ]]
+ | cpp_code
+sep ::= cpp_code | empty_string
+else_branch ::= $else [[ code ]]
+ | $elif exp [[ code ]] else_branch
+ | empty_string
+exp ::= simple_expression_in_Python_syntax
+```
+
+## Code ##
+
+You can find the source code of Pump in [scripts/pump.py](../scripts/pump.py). It is still
+very unpolished and lacks automated tests, although it has been
+successfully used many times. If you find a chance to use it in your
+project, please let us know what you think! We also welcome help on
+improving Pump.
+
+## Real Examples ##
+
+You can find real-world applications of Pump in [Google Test](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgoogletest\.googlecode\.com) and [Google Mock](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgooglemock\.googlecode\.com). The source file `foo.h.pump` generates `foo.h`.
+
+## Tips ##
+
+ * If a meta variable is followed by a letter or digit, you can separate them using `[[]]`, which inserts an empty string. For example `Foo$j[[]]Helper` generate `Foo1Helper` when `j` is 1.
+ * To avoid extra-long Pump source lines, you can break a line anywhere you want by inserting `[[]]` followed by a new line. Since any new-line character next to `[[` or `]]` is ignored, the generated code won't contain this new line.