summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '3rdParty/Boost/src/boost/lambda/detail/operator_return_type_traits.hpp')
-rw-r--r--3rdParty/Boost/src/boost/lambda/detail/operator_return_type_traits.hpp917
1 files changed, 917 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3rdParty/Boost/src/boost/lambda/detail/operator_return_type_traits.hpp b/3rdParty/Boost/src/boost/lambda/detail/operator_return_type_traits.hpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b2d3d3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3rdParty/Boost/src/boost/lambda/detail/operator_return_type_traits.hpp
@@ -0,0 +1,917 @@
+// operator_return_type_traits.hpp -- Boost Lambda Library ------------------
+
+// Copyright (C) 1999, 2000 Jaakko Jarvi (jaakko.jarvi@cs.utu.fi)
+//
+// Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See
+// accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
+// http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
+//
+// For more information, see www.boost.org
+
+#ifndef BOOST_LAMBDA_OPERATOR_RETURN_TYPE_TRAITS_HPP
+#define BOOST_LAMBDA_OPERATOR_RETURN_TYPE_TRAITS_HPP
+
+#include "boost/lambda/detail/is_instance_of.hpp"
+#include "boost/type_traits/same_traits.hpp"
+
+#include "boost/indirect_reference.hpp"
+#include "boost/detail/container_fwd.hpp"
+
+#include <cstddef> // needed for the ptrdiff_t
+#include <iosfwd> // for istream and ostream
+
+#include <iterator> // needed for operator&
+
+namespace boost {
+namespace lambda {
+namespace detail {
+
+// -- general helper templates for type deduction ------------------
+
+// Much of the type deduction code for standard arithmetic types from Gary Powell
+
+template <class A> struct promote_code { static const int value = -1; };
+// this means that a code is not defined for A
+
+// -- the next 5 types are needed in if_then_else_return
+// the promotion order is not important, but they must have distinct values.
+template <> struct promote_code<bool> { static const int value = 10; };
+template <> struct promote_code<char> { static const int value = 20; };
+template <> struct promote_code<unsigned char> { static const int value = 30; };
+template <> struct promote_code<signed char> { static const int value = 40; };
+template <> struct promote_code<short int> { static const int value = 50; };
+// ----------
+
+template <> struct promote_code<int> { static const int value = 100; };
+template <> struct promote_code<unsigned int> { static const int value = 200; };
+template <> struct promote_code<long> { static const int value = 300; };
+template <> struct promote_code<unsigned long> { static const int value = 400; };
+
+template <> struct promote_code<float> { static const int value = 500; };
+template <> struct promote_code<double> { static const int value = 600; };
+template <> struct promote_code<long double> { static const int value = 700; };
+
+// TODO: wchar_t
+
+// forward delcaration of complex.
+
+} // namespace detail
+} // namespace lambda
+} // namespace boost
+
+namespace boost {
+namespace lambda {
+namespace detail {
+
+template <> struct promote_code< std::complex<float> > { static const int value = 800; };
+template <> struct promote_code< std::complex<double> > { static const int value = 900; };
+template <> struct promote_code< std::complex<long double> > { static const int value = 1000; };
+
+// -- int promotion -------------------------------------------
+template <class T> struct promote_to_int { typedef T type; };
+
+template <> struct promote_to_int<bool> { typedef int type; };
+template <> struct promote_to_int<char> { typedef int type; };
+template <> struct promote_to_int<unsigned char> { typedef int type; };
+template <> struct promote_to_int<signed char> { typedef int type; };
+template <> struct promote_to_int<short int> { typedef int type; };
+
+// The unsigned short int promotion rule is this:
+// unsigned short int to signed int if a signed int can hold all values
+// of unsigned short int, otherwise go to unsigned int.
+template <> struct promote_to_int<unsigned short int>
+{
+ typedef
+ detail::IF<sizeof(int) <= sizeof(unsigned short int),
+// I had the logic reversed but ">" messes up the parsing.
+ unsigned int,
+ int>::RET type;
+};
+
+
+// TODO: think, should there be default behaviour for non-standard types?
+
+} // namespace detail
+
+// ------------------------------------------
+// Unary actions ----------------------------
+// ------------------------------------------
+
+template<class Act, class A>
+struct plain_return_type_1 {
+ typedef detail::unspecified type;
+};
+
+
+
+template<class Act, class A>
+struct plain_return_type_1<unary_arithmetic_action<Act>, A> {
+ typedef A type;
+};
+
+template<class Act, class A>
+struct return_type_1<unary_arithmetic_action<Act>, A> {
+ typedef
+ typename plain_return_type_1<
+ unary_arithmetic_action<Act>,
+ typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+
+template<class A>
+struct plain_return_type_1<bitwise_action<not_action>, A> {
+ typedef A type;
+};
+
+// bitwise not, operator~()
+template<class A> struct return_type_1<bitwise_action<not_action>, A> {
+ typedef
+ typename plain_return_type_1<
+ bitwise_action<not_action>,
+ typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+
+// prefix increment and decrement operators return
+// their argument by default as a non-const reference
+template<class Act, class A>
+struct plain_return_type_1<pre_increment_decrement_action<Act>, A> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+
+template<class Act, class A>
+struct return_type_1<pre_increment_decrement_action<Act>, A> {
+ typedef
+ typename plain_return_type_1<
+ pre_increment_decrement_action<Act>,
+ typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+// post decrement just returns the same plain type.
+template<class Act, class A>
+struct plain_return_type_1<post_increment_decrement_action<Act>, A> {
+ typedef A type;
+};
+
+template<class Act, class A>
+struct return_type_1<post_increment_decrement_action<Act>, A>
+{
+ typedef
+ typename plain_return_type_1<
+ post_increment_decrement_action<Act>,
+ typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+// logical not, operator!()
+template<class A>
+struct plain_return_type_1<logical_action<not_action>, A> {
+ typedef bool type;
+};
+
+template<class A>
+struct return_type_1<logical_action<not_action>, A> {
+ typedef
+ typename plain_return_type_1<
+ logical_action<not_action>,
+ typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+// address of action ---------------------------------------
+
+
+template<class A>
+struct return_type_1<other_action<addressof_action>, A> {
+ typedef
+ typename plain_return_type_1<
+ other_action<addressof_action>,
+ typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type
+ >::type type1;
+
+ // If no user defined specialization for A, then return the
+ // cv qualified pointer to A
+ typedef typename detail::IF<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ typename boost::remove_reference<A>::type*,
+ type1
+ >::RET type;
+};
+
+// contentsof action ------------------------------------
+
+// TODO: this deduction may lead to fail directly,
+// (if A has no specialization for iterator_traits and has no
+// typedef A::reference.
+// There is no easy way around this, cause there doesn't seem to be a way
+// to test whether a class is an iterator or not.
+
+// The default works with std::iterators.
+
+namespace detail {
+
+ // A is a nonreference type
+template <class A> struct contentsof_type {
+ typedef typename boost::indirect_reference<A>::type type;
+};
+
+ // this is since the nullary () in lambda_functor is always instantiated
+template <> struct contentsof_type<null_type> {
+ typedef detail::unspecified type;
+};
+
+
+template <class A> struct contentsof_type<const A> {
+ typedef typename contentsof_type<A>::type type;
+};
+
+template <class A> struct contentsof_type<volatile A> {
+ typedef typename contentsof_type<A>::type type;
+};
+
+template <class A> struct contentsof_type<const volatile A> {
+ typedef typename contentsof_type<A>::type type;
+};
+
+ // standard iterator traits should take care of the pointer types
+ // but just to be on the safe side, we have the specializations here:
+ // these work even if A is cv-qualified.
+template <class A> struct contentsof_type<A*> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+template <class A> struct contentsof_type<A* const> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+template <class A> struct contentsof_type<A* volatile> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+template <class A> struct contentsof_type<A* const volatile> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+
+template<class A, int N> struct contentsof_type<A[N]> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+template<class A, int N> struct contentsof_type<const A[N]> {
+ typedef const A& type;
+};
+template<class A, int N> struct contentsof_type<volatile A[N]> {
+ typedef volatile A& type;
+};
+template<class A, int N> struct contentsof_type<const volatile A[N]> {
+ typedef const volatile A& type;
+};
+
+
+
+
+
+} // end detail
+
+template<class A>
+struct return_type_1<other_action<contentsof_action>, A> {
+
+ typedef
+ typename plain_return_type_1<
+ other_action<contentsof_action>,
+ typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type
+ >::type type1;
+
+ // If no user defined specialization for A, then return the
+ // cv qualified pointer to A
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF_type<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ detail::contentsof_type<
+ typename boost::remove_reference<A>::type
+ >,
+ detail::identity_mapping<type1>
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------------------
+// binary actions ---------------------------------------------------
+// ------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+// here the default case is: no user defined versions:
+template <class Act, class A, class B>
+struct plain_return_type_2 {
+ typedef detail::unspecified type;
+};
+
+namespace detail {
+
+// error classes
+class illegal_pointer_arithmetic{};
+
+// pointer arithmetic type deductions ----------------------
+// value = false means that this is not a pointer arithmetic case
+// value = true means, that this can be a pointer arithmetic case, but not necessarily is
+// This means, that for user defined operators for pointer types, say for some operator+(X, *Y),
+// the deductions must be coded at an earliel level (return_type_2).
+
+template<class Act, class A, class B>
+struct pointer_arithmetic_traits { static const bool value = false; };
+
+template<class A, class B>
+struct pointer_arithmetic_traits<plus_action, A, B> {
+
+ typedef typename
+ array_to_pointer<typename boost::remove_reference<A>::type>::type AP;
+ typedef typename
+ array_to_pointer<typename boost::remove_reference<B>::type>::type BP;
+
+ static const bool is_pointer_A = boost::is_pointer<AP>::value;
+ static const bool is_pointer_B = boost::is_pointer<BP>::value;
+
+ static const bool value = is_pointer_A || is_pointer_B;
+
+ // can't add two pointers.
+ // note, that we do not check wether the other type is valid for
+ // addition with a pointer.
+ // the compiler will catch it in the apply function
+
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF<
+ is_pointer_A && is_pointer_B,
+ detail::return_type_deduction_failure<
+ detail::illegal_pointer_arithmetic
+ >,
+ typename detail::IF<is_pointer_A, AP, BP>::RET
+ >::RET type;
+
+};
+
+template<class A, class B>
+struct pointer_arithmetic_traits<minus_action, A, B> {
+ typedef typename
+ array_to_pointer<typename boost::remove_reference<A>::type>::type AP;
+ typedef typename
+ array_to_pointer<typename boost::remove_reference<B>::type>::type BP;
+
+ static const bool is_pointer_A = boost::is_pointer<AP>::value;
+ static const bool is_pointer_B = boost::is_pointer<BP>::value;
+
+ static const bool value = is_pointer_A || is_pointer_B;
+
+ static const bool same_pointer_type =
+ is_pointer_A && is_pointer_B &&
+ boost::is_same<
+ typename boost::remove_const<
+ typename boost::remove_pointer<
+ typename boost::remove_const<AP>::type
+ >::type
+ >::type,
+ typename boost::remove_const<
+ typename boost::remove_pointer<
+ typename boost::remove_const<BP>::type
+ >::type
+ >::type
+ >::value;
+
+ // ptr - ptr has type ptrdiff_t
+ // note, that we do not check if, in ptr - B, B is
+ // valid for subtraction with a pointer.
+ // the compiler will catch it in the apply function
+
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF<
+ same_pointer_type, const std::ptrdiff_t,
+ typename detail::IF<
+ is_pointer_A,
+ AP,
+ detail::return_type_deduction_failure<detail::illegal_pointer_arithmetic>
+ >::RET
+ >::RET type;
+};
+
+} // namespace detail
+
+// -- arithmetic actions ---------------------------------------------
+
+namespace detail {
+
+template<bool is_pointer_arithmetic, class Act, class A, class B>
+struct return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_1;
+
+template<class A, class B> struct return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_2;
+template<class A, class B> struct return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_3;
+
+} // namespace detail
+
+
+// drop any qualifiers from the argument types within arithmetic_action
+template<class A, class B, class Act>
+struct return_type_2<arithmetic_action<Act>, A, B>
+{
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<arithmetic_action<Act>, plain_A, plain_B>::type type1;
+
+ // if user defined return type, do not enter the whole arithmetic deductions
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF_type<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ detail::return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_1<
+ detail::pointer_arithmetic_traits<Act, A, B>::value, Act, A, B
+ >,
+ plain_return_type_2<arithmetic_action<Act>, plain_A, plain_B>
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+namespace detail {
+
+// perform integral promotion, no pointer arithmetic
+template<bool is_pointer_arithmetic, class Act, class A, class B>
+struct return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_1
+{
+ typedef typename
+ return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_2<
+ typename remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type,
+ typename remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+// pointer_arithmetic
+template<class Act, class A, class B>
+struct return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_1<true, Act, A, B>
+{
+ typedef typename
+ pointer_arithmetic_traits<Act, A, B>::type type;
+};
+
+template<class A, class B>
+struct return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_2 {
+ typedef typename
+ return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_3<
+ typename promote_to_int<A>::type,
+ typename promote_to_int<B>::type
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+// specialization for unsigned int.
+// We only have to do these two specialization because the value promotion will
+// take care of the other cases.
+// The unsigned int promotion rule is this:
+// unsigned int to long if a long can hold all values of unsigned int,
+// otherwise go to unsigned long.
+
+// struct so I don't have to type this twice.
+struct promotion_of_unsigned_int
+{
+ typedef
+ detail::IF<sizeof(long) <= sizeof(unsigned int),
+ unsigned long,
+ long>::RET type;
+};
+
+template<>
+struct return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_2<unsigned int, long>
+{
+ typedef promotion_of_unsigned_int::type type;
+};
+template<>
+struct return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_2<long, unsigned int>
+{
+ typedef promotion_of_unsigned_int::type type;
+};
+
+
+template<class A, class B> struct return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_3 {
+ enum { promote_code_A_value = promote_code<A>::value,
+ promote_code_B_value = promote_code<B>::value }; // enums for KCC
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF<
+ promote_code_A_value == -1 || promote_code_B_value == -1,
+ detail::return_type_deduction_failure<return_type_2_arithmetic_phase_3>,
+ typename detail::IF<
+ ((int)promote_code_A_value > (int)promote_code_B_value),
+ A,
+ B
+ >::RET
+ >::RET type;
+};
+
+} // namespace detail
+
+// -- bitwise actions -------------------------------------------
+// note: for integral types deuduction is similar to arithmetic actions.
+
+// drop any qualifiers from the argument types within arithmetic action
+template<class A, class B, class Act>
+struct return_type_2<bitwise_action<Act>, A, B>
+{
+
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<bitwise_action<Act>, plain_A, plain_B>::type type1;
+
+ // if user defined return type, do not enter type deductions
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF_type<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ return_type_2<arithmetic_action<plus_action>, A, B>,
+ plain_return_type_2<bitwise_action<Act>, plain_A, plain_B>
+ >::type type;
+
+ // plus_action is just a random pick, has to be a concrete instance
+
+ // TODO: This check is only valid for built-in types, overloaded types might
+ // accept floating point operators
+
+ // bitwise operators not defined for floating point types
+ // these test are not strictly needed here, since the error will be caught in
+ // the apply function
+ BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(!(boost::is_float<plain_A>::value && boost::is_float<plain_B>::value));
+
+};
+
+namespace detail {
+
+#ifdef BOOST_NO_TEMPLATED_STREAMS
+
+template<class A, class B>
+struct leftshift_type {
+
+ typedef typename detail::IF<
+ boost::is_convertible<
+ typename boost::remove_reference<A>::type*,
+ std::ostream*
+ >::value,
+ std::ostream&,
+ typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type
+ >::RET type;
+};
+
+template<class A, class B>
+struct rightshift_type {
+
+ typedef typename detail::IF<
+
+ boost::is_convertible<
+ typename boost::remove_reference<A>::type*,
+ std::istream*
+ >::value,
+ std::istream&,
+ typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type
+ >::RET type;
+};
+
+#else
+
+template <class T> struct get_ostream_type {
+ typedef std::basic_ostream<typename T::char_type,
+ typename T::traits_type>& type;
+};
+
+template <class T> struct get_istream_type {
+ typedef std::basic_istream<typename T::char_type,
+ typename T::traits_type>& type;
+};
+
+template<class A, class B>
+struct leftshift_type {
+private:
+ typedef typename boost::remove_reference<A>::type plainA;
+public:
+ typedef typename detail::IF_type<
+ is_instance_of_2<plainA, std::basic_ostream>::value,
+ get_ostream_type<plainA>, //reference to the stream
+ detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+template<class A, class B>
+struct rightshift_type {
+private:
+ typedef typename boost::remove_reference<A>::type plainA;
+public:
+ typedef typename detail::IF_type<
+ is_instance_of_2<plainA, std::basic_istream>::value,
+ get_istream_type<plainA>, //reference to the stream
+ detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+
+#endif
+
+} // end detail
+
+// ostream
+template<class A, class B>
+struct return_type_2<bitwise_action<leftshift_action>, A, B>
+{
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<bitwise_action<leftshift_action>, plain_A, plain_B>::type type1;
+
+ // if user defined return type, do not enter type deductions
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF_type<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ detail::leftshift_type<A, B>,
+ plain_return_type_2<bitwise_action<leftshift_action>, plain_A, plain_B>
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+// istream
+template<class A, class B>
+struct return_type_2<bitwise_action<rightshift_action>, A, B>
+{
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<bitwise_action<rightshift_action>, plain_A, plain_B>::type type1;
+
+ // if user defined return type, do not enter type deductions
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF_type<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ detail::rightshift_type<A, B>,
+ plain_return_type_2<bitwise_action<rightshift_action>, plain_A, plain_B>
+ >::type type;
+};
+
+// -- logical actions ----------------------------------------
+// always bool
+// NOTE: this may not be true for some weird user-defined types,
+template<class A, class B, class Act>
+struct plain_return_type_2<logical_action<Act>, A, B> {
+ typedef bool type;
+};
+
+template<class A, class B, class Act>
+struct return_type_2<logical_action<Act>, A, B> {
+
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<logical_action<Act>, plain_A, plain_B>::type type;
+
+};
+
+
+// -- relational actions ----------------------------------------
+// always bool
+// NOTE: this may not be true for some weird user-defined types,
+template<class A, class B, class Act>
+struct plain_return_type_2<relational_action<Act>, A, B> {
+ typedef bool type;
+};
+
+template<class A, class B, class Act>
+struct return_type_2<relational_action<Act>, A, B> {
+
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<relational_action<Act>, plain_A, plain_B>::type type;
+};
+
+// Assingment actions -----------------------------------------------
+// return type is the type of the first argument as reference
+
+// note that cv-qualifiers are preserved.
+// Yes, assignment operator can be const!
+
+// NOTE: this may not be true for some weird user-defined types,
+
+template<class A, class B, class Act>
+struct return_type_2<arithmetic_assignment_action<Act>, A, B> {
+
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<
+ arithmetic_assignment_action<Act>, plain_A, plain_B
+ >::type type1;
+
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ typename boost::add_reference<A>::type,
+ type1
+ >::RET type;
+};
+
+template<class A, class B, class Act>
+struct return_type_2<bitwise_assignment_action<Act>, A, B> {
+
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<
+ bitwise_assignment_action<Act>, plain_A, plain_B
+ >::type type1;
+
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ typename boost::add_reference<A>::type,
+ type1
+ >::RET type;
+};
+
+template<class A, class B>
+struct return_type_2<other_action<assignment_action>, A, B> {
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<
+ other_action<assignment_action>, plain_A, plain_B
+ >::type type1;
+
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ typename boost::add_reference<A>::type,
+ type1
+ >::RET type;
+};
+
+// -- other actions ----------------------------------------
+
+// comma action ----------------------------------
+// Note: this may not be true for some weird user-defined types,
+
+// NOTE! This only tries the plain_return_type_2 layer and gives
+// detail::unspecified as default. If no such specialization is found, the
+// type rule in the spcecialization of the return_type_2_prot is used
+// to give the type of the right argument (which can be a reference too)
+// (The built in operator, can return a l- or rvalue).
+template<class A, class B>
+struct return_type_2<other_action<comma_action>, A, B> {
+
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<
+ other_action<comma_action>, plain_A, plain_B
+ >::type type;
+ };
+
+// subscript action -----------------------------------------------
+
+
+namespace detail {
+ // A and B are nonreference types
+template <class A, class B> struct subscript_type {
+ typedef detail::unspecified type;
+};
+
+template <class A, class B> struct subscript_type<A*, B> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+template <class A, class B> struct subscript_type<A* const, B> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+template <class A, class B> struct subscript_type<A* volatile, B> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+template <class A, class B> struct subscript_type<A* const volatile, B> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+
+
+template<class A, class B, int N> struct subscript_type<A[N], B> {
+ typedef A& type;
+};
+
+ // these 3 specializations are needed to make gcc <3 happy
+template<class A, class B, int N> struct subscript_type<const A[N], B> {
+ typedef const A& type;
+};
+template<class A, class B, int N> struct subscript_type<volatile A[N], B> {
+ typedef volatile A& type;
+};
+template<class A, class B, int N> struct subscript_type<const volatile A[N], B> {
+ typedef const volatile A& type;
+};
+
+} // end detail
+
+template<class A, class B>
+struct return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, A, B> {
+
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<A>::type plain_A;
+ typedef typename detail::remove_reference_and_cv<B>::type plain_B;
+
+ typedef typename boost::remove_reference<A>::type nonref_A;
+ typedef typename boost::remove_reference<B>::type nonref_B;
+
+ typedef typename
+ plain_return_type_2<
+ other_action<subscript_action>, plain_A, plain_B
+ >::type type1;
+
+ typedef typename
+ detail::IF_type<
+ boost::is_same<type1, detail::unspecified>::value,
+ detail::subscript_type<nonref_A, nonref_B>,
+ plain_return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, plain_A, plain_B>
+ >::type type;
+
+};
+
+template<class Key, class T, class Cmp, class Allocator, class B>
+struct plain_return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, std::map<Key, T, Cmp, Allocator>, B> {
+ typedef T& type;
+ // T == std::map<Key, T, Cmp, Allocator>::mapped_type;
+};
+
+template<class Key, class T, class Cmp, class Allocator, class B>
+struct plain_return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, std::multimap<Key, T, Cmp, Allocator>, B> {
+ typedef T& type;
+ // T == std::map<Key, T, Cmp, Allocator>::mapped_type;
+};
+
+ // deque
+template<class T, class Allocator, class B>
+struct plain_return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, std::deque<T, Allocator>, B> {
+ typedef typename std::deque<T, Allocator>::reference type;
+};
+template<class T, class Allocator, class B>
+struct plain_return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, const std::deque<T, Allocator>, B> {
+ typedef typename std::deque<T, Allocator>::const_reference type;
+};
+
+ // vector
+template<class T, class Allocator, class B>
+struct plain_return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, std::vector<T, Allocator>, B> {
+ typedef typename std::vector<T, Allocator>::reference type;
+};
+template<class T, class Allocator, class B>
+struct plain_return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, const std::vector<T, Allocator>, B> {
+ typedef typename std::vector<T, Allocator>::const_reference type;
+};
+
+ // basic_string
+template<class Char, class Traits, class Allocator, class B>
+struct plain_return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator>, B> {
+ typedef typename std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator>::reference type;
+};
+template<class Char, class Traits, class Allocator, class B>
+struct plain_return_type_2<other_action<subscript_action>, const std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator>, B> {
+ typedef typename std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator>::const_reference type;
+};
+
+template<class Char, class Traits, class Allocator>
+struct plain_return_type_2<arithmetic_action<plus_action>,
+ std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator>,
+ std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator> > {
+ typedef std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator> type;
+};
+
+template<class Char, class Traits, class Allocator>
+struct plain_return_type_2<arithmetic_action<plus_action>,
+ const Char*,
+ std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator> > {
+ typedef std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator> type;
+};
+
+template<class Char, class Traits, class Allocator>
+struct plain_return_type_2<arithmetic_action<plus_action>,
+ std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator>,
+ const Char*> {
+ typedef std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator> type;
+};
+
+template<class Char, class Traits, class Allocator, std::size_t N>
+struct plain_return_type_2<arithmetic_action<plus_action>,
+ Char[N],
+ std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator> > {
+ typedef std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator> type;
+};
+
+template<class Char, class Traits, class Allocator, std::size_t N>
+struct plain_return_type_2<arithmetic_action<plus_action>,
+ std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator>,
+ Char[N]> {
+ typedef std::basic_string<Char, Traits, Allocator> type;
+};
+
+
+} // namespace lambda
+} // namespace boost
+
+#endif
+
+