Integrate googletest and googlemock libraries to 3rdParty

googletest and googlemock from release 1.8.0 have been copied to the 3rdParty folder. With this commit tests for Swift project can also written using googletest and googlemock APIs. The test runners will execute test suites written to either test library. Passing —-xml to a test runner will now create two test report XML files, namely $programName-report.cppunit.xml and $programName-report.gtest.xml. The ByteArrayTest has been converted to use googletest instead of googlemock to serve as an example and test the integration. Test-Information: Build all tests via ‘./scons test=all’ and verified all tests are run. Build all tests via ‘./scons test=all checker_report=1’ and verified that two report XML files are generated per test runner executed. Change-Id: I81a9fb2c7ea5612fc1b34eef70ed7e711bfeea81
author: Tobias Markmann <tm@ayena.de> 2017-01-10 20:22:26 (GMT)
committer: Tobias Markmann <tm@ayena.de> 2017-01-11 18:23:48 (GMT)
commit: 3b0cde2e6dbf26a01a59b0004e4041199731cbc8 (patch)
tree: 0b2ba6addb161f1d3e437a64685ea797341a149b /3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
parent: a0c339f80e4585341179edef1898defd21a0d36a (diff)
download: swift-3b0cde2e6dbf26a01a59b0004e4041199731cbc8.zip
swift-3b0cde2e6dbf26a01a59b0004e4041199731cbc8.tar.bz2
1 files changed, 1228 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc b/3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5ca5bc7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,1228 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the built-in actions generated by a script.
+
+#include "gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h"
+
+#include <functional>
+#include <sstream>
+#include <string>
+#include "gmock/gmock.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace gmock_generated_actions_test {
+
+using ::std::plus;
+using ::std::string;
+using testing::get;
+using testing::make_tuple;
+using testing::tuple;
+using testing::tuple_element;
+using testing::_;
+using testing::Action;
+using testing::ActionInterface;
+using testing::ByRef;
+using testing::DoAll;
+using testing::Invoke;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::ReturnNew;
+using testing::SetArgPointee;
+using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq;
+using testing::Unused;
+using testing::WithArgs;
+
+// For suppressing compiler warnings on conversion possibly losing precision.
+inline short Short(short n) { return n; }  // NOLINT
+inline char Char(char ch) { return ch; }
+
+// Sample functions and functors for testing various actions.
+int Nullary() { return 1; }
+
+class NullaryFunctor {
+ public:
+  int operator()() { return 2; }
+};
+
+bool g_done = false;
+
+bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; }
+
+const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; }
+
+bool ByConstRef(const string& s) { return s == "Hi"; }
+
+const double g_double = 0;
+bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; }
+
+string ByNonConstRef(string& s) { return s += "+"; }  // NOLINT
+
+struct UnaryFunctor {
+  int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; }
+};
+
+const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; }  // NOLINT
+
+void VoidBinary(int, char) { g_done = true; }
+
+int Ternary(int x, char y, short z) { return x + y + z; }  // NOLINT
+
+void VoidTernary(int, char, bool) { g_done = true; }
+
+int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; }
+
+string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4;
+}
+
+int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; }
+
+struct SumOf5Functor {
+  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e;
+  }
+};
+
+string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5;
+}
+
+int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+  return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+}
+
+struct SumOf6Functor {
+  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+  }
+};
+
+string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6;
+}
+
+string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+               const char* s7) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7;
+}
+
+string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+               const char* s7, const char* s8) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8;
+}
+
+string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+               const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9;
+}
+
+string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9,
+                const char* s10) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10;
+}
+
+// A helper that turns the type of a C-string literal from const
+// char[N] to const char*.
+inline const char* CharPtr(const char* s) { return s; }
+
+// Tests InvokeArgument<N>(...).
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a nullary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function0) {
+  Action<int(int, int(*)())> a = InvokeArgument<1>();  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2, &Nullary)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a unary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor1) {
+  Action<int(UnaryFunctor)> a = InvokeArgument<0>(true);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(UnaryFunctor())));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function5) {
+  Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf5)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary functor.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor5) {
+  Action<int(SumOf5Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf5Functor())));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function6) {
+  Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf6)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary functor.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor6) {
+  Action<int(SumOf6Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf6Functor())));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 7-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function7) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7");
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat7)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 8-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function8) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8");
+  EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat8)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 9-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function9) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9");
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat9)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 10-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function10) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0");
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a pointer argument.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByPointerFunction) {
+  Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(static_cast<const char*>("Hi"), Short(1));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const char*
+// by passing it a C-string literal.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, FunctionWithCStringLiteral) {
+  Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>("Hi", Short(1));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const reference.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByConstReferenceFunction) {
+  Action<bool(bool(*function)(const string& s))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(string("Hi"));
+  // When action 'a' is constructed, it makes a copy of the temporary
+  // string object passed to it, so it's OK to use 'a' later, when the
+  // temporary object has already died.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ByConstRef)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with ByRef() and a function that takes a
+// const reference.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByExplicitConstReferenceFunction) {
+  Action<bool(bool(*)(const double& x))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(g_double));
+  // The above line calls ByRef() on a const value.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
+
+  double x = 0;
+  a = InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(x));  // This calls ByRef() on a non-const.
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs and with an action that takes 1 argument.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, OneArg) {
+  Action<bool(double x, int n)> a = WithArgs<1>(Invoke(Unary));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 2 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, TwoArgs) {
+  Action<const char*(const char* s, double x, short n)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 2>(Invoke(Binary));
+  const char s[] = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr(s), 0.5, Short(2))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 3 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ThreeArgs) {
+  Action<int(int, double, char, short)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 2, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 6.5, Char(20), Short(3))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 4 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, FourArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, double, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<4, 3, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat4));
+  EXPECT_EQ("4310", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), 2.5,
+                                         CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 5 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, FiveArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat5));
+  EXPECT_EQ("43210",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
+                                 CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 6 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, SixArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat6));
+  EXPECT_EQ("012210",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 7 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, SevenArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat7));
+  EXPECT_EQ("0123210",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
+                                 CharPtr("3"))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 8 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, EightArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat8));
+  EXPECT_EQ("01230123",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
+                                 CharPtr("3"))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 9 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, NineArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat9));
+  EXPECT_EQ("012312323",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
+                                 CharPtr("3"))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 10 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, TenArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat10));
+  EXPECT_EQ("0123210123",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
+                                 CharPtr("3"))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that is not Invoke().
+class SubstractAction : public ActionInterface<int(int, int)> {  // NOLINT
+ public:
+  virtual int Perform(const tuple<int, int>& args) {
+    return get<0>(args) - get<1>(args);
+  }
+};
+
+TEST(WithArgsTest, NonInvokeAction) {
+  Action<int(const string&, int, int)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<2, 1>(MakeAction(new SubstractAction));
+  string s("hello");
+  EXPECT_EQ(8, a.Perform(tuple<const string&, int, int>(s, 2, 10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs to pass all original arguments in the original order.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, Identity) {
+  Action<int(int x, char y, short z)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, Char(20), Short(3))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with repeated arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, RepeatedArguments) {
+  Action<int(bool, int m, int n)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<1, 1, 1, 1>(Invoke(SumOf4));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1, 10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with reversed argument order.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ReversedArgumentOrder) {
+  Action<const char*(short n, const char* input)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<1, 0>(Invoke(Binary));
+  const char s[] = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(Short(2), CharPtr(s))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with compatible, but not identical, argument types.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ArgsOfCompatibleTypes) {
+  Action<long(short x, char y, double z, char c)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(Short(100), Char(20), 5.6, Char(3))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that returns void.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, VoidAction) {
+  Action<void(double x, char c, int n)> a = WithArgs<2, 1>(Invoke(VoidBinary));
+  g_done = false;
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 'a', 3));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2).
+TEST(DoAllTest, TwoActions) {
+  int n = 0;
+  Action<int(int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
+                              Return(2));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(make_tuple(&n)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3).
+TEST(DoAllTest, ThreeActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  Action<int(int*, int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
+                                    SetArgPointee<1>(2),
+                                    Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4).
+TEST(DoAllTest, FourActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char ch = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*)> a =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgPointee<2>('a'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &ch)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', ch);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5).
+TEST(DoAllTest, FiveActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgPointee<3>('b'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a6).
+TEST(DoAllTest, SixActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgPointee<4>('c'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a7).
+TEST(DoAllTest, SevenActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgPointee<5>('d'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a8).
+TEST(DoAllTest, EightActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
+             char*)> action =
+      DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgPointee<5>('d'),
+            SetArgPointee<6>('e'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a9).
+TEST(DoAllTest, NineActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0', f = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
+             char*, char*)> action =
+      DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgPointee<5>('d'),
+            SetArgPointee<6>('e'),
+            SetArgPointee<7>('f'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
+  EXPECT_EQ('f', f);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a10).
+TEST(DoAllTest, TenActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0';
+  char e = '\0', f = '\0', g = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
+             char*, char*, char*)> action =
+      DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgPointee<5>('d'),
+            SetArgPointee<6>('e'),
+            SetArgPointee<7>('f'),
+            SetArgPointee<8>('g'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f, &g)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
+  EXPECT_EQ('f', f);
+  EXPECT_EQ('g', g);
+}
+
+// The ACTION*() macros trigger warning C4100 (unreferenced formal
+// parameter) in MSVC with -W4.  Unfortunately they cannot be fixed in
+// the macro definition, as the warnings are generated when the macro
+// is expanded and macro expansion cannot contain #pragma.  Therefore
+// we suppress them here.
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(push)
+# pragma warning(disable:4100)
+#endif
+
+// Tests the ACTION*() macro family.
+
+// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that doesn't reference the
+// mock function arguments.
+ACTION(Return5) { return 5; }
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenNotReferencingArguments) {
+  Action<double()> a1 = Return5();
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  Action<int(double, bool)> a2 = Return5();
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that returns void.
+ACTION(IncrementArg1) { (*arg1)++; }
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenReturningVoid) {
+  Action<void(int, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg1();
+  int n = 0;
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, &n));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the type of the
+// argument.
+ACTION(IncrementArg2) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int*, arg2_type>();
+  arg2_type temp = arg2;
+  (*temp)++;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentType) {
+  Action<void(int, bool, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg2();
+  int n = 0;
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, false, &n));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the argument tuple
+// via args_type and args.
+ACTION(Sum2) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<tuple<int, char, int*>, args_type>();
+  args_type args_copy = args;
+  return get<0>(args_copy) + get<1>(args_copy);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentTuple) {
+  Action<int(int, char, int*)> a1 = Sum2();
+  int dummy = 0;
+  EXPECT_EQ(11, a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, Char(6), &dummy)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function
+// type.
+int Dummy(bool flag) { return flag? 1 : 0; }
+
+ACTION(InvokeDummy) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int(bool), function_type>();
+  function_type* fp = &Dummy;
+  return (*fp)(true);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionType) {
+  Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function's
+// return type.
+ACTION(InvokeDummy2) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int, return_type>();
+  return_type result = Dummy(true);
+  return result;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionReturnType) {
+  Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy2();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by const reference.
+ACTION(ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<const bool&, arg1_type>();
+  return &arg1;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForConstReferenceArg) {
+  Action<const bool*(int, const bool&)> a = ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg();
+  const bool b = false;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&b, a.Perform(tuple<int, const bool&>(0, b)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by non-const reference.
+ACTION(ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int&, arg0_type>();
+  return &arg0;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForNonConstReferenceArg) {
+  Action<int*(int&, bool, int)> a = ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg();
+  int n = 0;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, a.Perform(tuple<int&, bool, int>(n, true, 1)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() can be used in a namespace.
+namespace action_test {
+ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; }
+}  // namespace action_test
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksInNamespace) {
+  Action<int(int, int)> a1 = action_test::Sum();
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, 2)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the same ACTION definition works for mock functions with
+// different argument numbers.
+ACTION(PlusTwo) { return arg0 + 2; }
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForDifferentArgumentNumbers) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = PlusTwo();
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
+
+  Action<double(float, void*)> a2 = PlusTwo();
+  int dummy;
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(6, a2.Perform(make_tuple(4.0f, &dummy)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_P can define a parameterized action.
+ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; }
+
+TEST(ActionPMacroTest, DefinesParameterizedAction) {
+  Action<int(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(9);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION_P can reference the argument types
+// and the parameter type.
+ACTION_P(TypedPlus, n) {
+  arg0_type t1 = arg0;
+  n_type t2 = n;
+  return t1 + t2;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) {
+  Action<int(char m, bool t)> a1 = TypedPlus(9);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(Char(1), true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that a parameterized action can be used in any mock function
+// whose type is compatible.
+TEST(ActionPMacroTest, WorksInCompatibleMockFunction) {
+  Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a1 = Plus("tail");
+  const std::string re = "re";
+  EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(tuple<const std::string&>(re)));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can use ACTION*() to define actions overloaded on the
+// number of parameters.
+
+ACTION(OverloadedAction) { return arg0 ? arg1 : "hello"; }
+
+ACTION_P(OverloadedAction, default_value) {
+  return arg0 ? arg1 : default_value;
+}
+
+ACTION_P2(OverloadedAction, true_value, false_value) {
+  return arg0 ? true_value : false_value;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanDefineOverloadedActions) {
+  typedef Action<const char*(bool, const char*)> MyAction;
+
+  const MyAction a1 = OverloadedAction();
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hello", a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
+
+  const MyAction a2 = OverloadedAction("hi");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
+
+  const MyAction a3 = OverloadedAction("hi", "you");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a3.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("you", a3.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
+}
+
+// Tests ACTION_Pn where n >= 3.
+
+ACTION_P3(Plus, m, n, k) { return arg0 + m + n + k; }
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor3Parameters) {
+  Action<double(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(100, 20, 3.4);
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(3123.4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(3000, true)));
+
+  Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a2 = Plus("tail", "-", ">");
+  const std::string re = "re";
+  EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(tuple<const std::string&>(re)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P4(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3; }
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor4Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P5(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4; }
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor5Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P6(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor6Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P7(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor7Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P8(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor8Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P9(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor9Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P10(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, last_param) {
+  arg0_type t0 = arg0;
+  last_param_type t9 = last_param;
+  return t0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + t9;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor10Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10,
+            a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the action body can promote the parameter types.
+
+ACTION_P2(PadArgument, prefix, suffix) {
+  // The following lines promote the two parameters to desired types.
+  std::string prefix_str(prefix);
+  char suffix_char = static_cast<char>(suffix);
+  return prefix_str + arg0 + suffix_char;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) {
+  Action<std::string(const char*)> no_promo =
+      PadArgument(std::string("foo"), 'r');
+  Action<std::string(const char*)> promo =
+      PadArgument("foo", static_cast<int>('r'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", no_promo.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("ba"))));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", promo.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("ba"))));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can partially restrict parameter types using a
+// straight-forward pattern.
+
+// Defines a generic action that doesn't restrict the types of its
+// parameters.
+ACTION_P3(ConcatImpl, a, b, c) {
+  std::stringstream ss;
+  ss << a << b << c;
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Next, we try to restrict that either the first parameter is a
+// string, or the second parameter is an int.
+
+// Defines a partially specialized wrapper that restricts the first
+// parameter to std::string.
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+// ConcatImplActionP3 is the class template ACTION_P3 uses to
+// implement ConcatImpl.  We shouldn't change the name as this
+// pattern requires the user to use it directly.
+ConcatImplActionP3<std::string, T1, T2>
+Concat(const std::string& a, T1 b, T2 c) {
+  GTEST_INTENTIONAL_CONST_COND_PUSH_()
+  if (true) {
+  GTEST_INTENTIONAL_CONST_COND_POP_()
+    // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can be invoked without
+    // explicit template arguments.
+    return ConcatImpl(a, b, c);
+  } else {
+    // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can also be invoked with
+    // explicit template arguments.  It doesn't really need to be
+    // executed as this is a compile-time verification.
+    return ConcatImpl<std::string, T1, T2>(a, b, c);
+  }
+}
+
+// Defines another partially specialized wrapper that restricts the
+// second parameter to int.
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+ConcatImplActionP3<T1, int, T2>
+Concat(T1 a, int b, T2 c) {
+  return ConcatImpl(a, b, c);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanPartiallyRestrictParameterTypes) {
+  Action<const std::string()> a1 = Concat("Hello", "1", 2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("Hello12", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  a1 = Concat(1, 2, 3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("123", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Verifies the type of an ACTION*.
+
+ACTION(DoFoo) {}
+ACTION_P(DoFoo, p) {}
+ACTION_P2(DoFoo, p0, p1) {}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, TypesAreCorrect) {
+  // DoFoo() must be assignable to a DoFooAction variable.
+  DoFooAction a0 = DoFoo();
+
+  // DoFoo(1) must be assignable to a DoFooActionP variable.
+  DoFooActionP<int> a1 = DoFoo(1);
+
+  // DoFoo(p1, ..., pk) must be assignable to a DoFooActionPk
+  // variable, and so on.
+  DoFooActionP2<int, char> a2 = DoFoo(1, '2');
+  PlusActionP3<int, int, char> a3 = Plus(1, 2, '3');
+  PlusActionP4<int, int, int, char> a4 = Plus(1, 2, 3, '4');
+  PlusActionP5<int, int, int, int, char> a5 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, '5');
+  PlusActionP6<int, int, int, int, int, char> a6 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '6');
+  PlusActionP7<int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a7 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7');
+  PlusActionP8<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a8 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, '8');
+  PlusActionP9<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a9 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, '9');
+  PlusActionP10<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a10 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, '0');
+
+  // Avoid "unused variable" warnings.
+  (void)a0;
+  (void)a1;
+  (void)a2;
+  (void)a3;
+  (void)a4;
+  (void)a5;
+  (void)a6;
+  (void)a7;
+  (void)a8;
+  (void)a9;
+  (void)a10;
+}
+
+// Tests that an ACTION_P*() action can be explicitly instantiated
+// with reference-typed parameters.
+
+ACTION_P(Plus1, x) { return x; }
+ACTION_P2(Plus2, x, y) { return x + y; }
+ACTION_P3(Plus3, x, y, z) { return x + y + z; }
+ACTION_P10(Plus10, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9) {
+  return a0 + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanExplicitlyInstantiateWithReferenceTypes) {
+  int x = 1, y = 2, z = 3;
+  const tuple<> empty = make_tuple();
+
+  Action<int()> a = Plus1<int&>(x);
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(empty));
+
+  a = Plus2<const int&, int&>(x, y);
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(empty));
+
+  a = Plus3<int&, const int&, int&>(x, y, z);
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(empty));
+
+  int n[10] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 };
+  a = Plus10<const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&,
+      int&, const int&, int&>(n[0], n[1], n[2], n[3], n[4], n[5], n[6], n[7],
+                              n[8], n[9]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(empty));
+}
+
+class NullaryConstructorClass {
+ public:
+  NullaryConstructorClass() : value_(123) {}
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using ReturnNew() with a nullary constructor.
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, NoArgs) {
+  Action<NullaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<NullaryConstructorClass>();
+  NullaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+class UnaryConstructorClass {
+ public:
+  explicit UnaryConstructorClass(int value) : value_(value) {}
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using ReturnNew() with a unary constructor.
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, Unary) {
+  Action<UnaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
+  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodHasArgs) {
+  Action<UnaryConstructorClass*(bool, int)> a =
+      ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
+  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodReturnsPointerToConst) {
+  Action<const UnaryConstructorClass*()> a =
+      ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
+  const UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+class TenArgConstructorClass {
+ public:
+  TenArgConstructorClass(int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5,
+                         int a6, int a7, int a8, int a9, int a10)
+    : value_(a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9 + a10) {
+  }
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using ReturnNew() with a 10-argument constructor.
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, ConstructorThatTakes10Arguments) {
+  Action<TenArgConstructorClass*()> a =
+      ReturnNew<TenArgConstructorClass>(1000000000, 200000000, 30000000,
+                                        4000000, 500000, 60000,
+                                        7000, 800, 90, 0);
+  TenArgConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1234567890, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there is no value parameter.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T),
+                AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) {
+  return new T;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithoutValueParam) {
+  const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>();
+  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  delete p;
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there are value parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T),
+                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(a0)) {
+  return new T(a0);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithValueParams) {
+  const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(42);
+  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
+  delete p;
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for integral template parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(MyDeleteArg,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k),
+                AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) {
+  delete get<k>(args);
+}
+
+// Resets a bool variable in the destructor.
+class BoolResetter {
+ public:
+  explicit BoolResetter(bool* value) : value_(value) {}
+  ~BoolResetter() { *value_ = false; }
+ private:
+  bool* value_;
+};
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForIntegralTemplateParams) {
+  const Action<void(int*, BoolResetter*)> a = MyDeleteArg<1>();
+  int n = 0;
+  bool b = true;
+  BoolResetter* resetter = new BoolResetter(&b);
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(&n, resetter));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(b);  // Verifies that resetter is deleted.
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATES works for template template parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSmartPointer,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(template <typename Pointee> class,
+                                      Pointer),
+                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(pointee)) {
+  return Pointer<pointee_type>(new pointee_type(pointee));
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForTemplateTemplateParameters) {
+  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
+  const Action<linked_ptr<int>()> a = ReturnSmartPointer<linked_ptr>(42);
+  linked_ptr<int> p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 template parameters.
+template <typename T1, typename T2, typename T3, int k4, bool k5,
+          unsigned int k6, typename T7, typename T8, typename T9>
+struct GiantTemplate {
+ public:
+  explicit GiantTemplate(int a_value) : value(a_value) {}
+  int value;
+};
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnGiant,
+                HAS_10_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(
+                    typename, T1,
+                    typename, T2,
+                    typename, T3,
+                    int, k4,
+                    bool, k5,
+                    unsigned int, k6,
+                    class, T7,
+                    class, T8,
+                    class, T9,
+                    template <typename T> class, T10),
+                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(value)) {
+  return GiantTemplate<T10<T1>, T2, T3, k4, k5, k6, T7, T8, T9>(value);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10TemplateParameters) {
+  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
+  typedef GiantTemplate<linked_ptr<int>, bool, double, 5,
+      true, 6, char, unsigned, int> Giant;
+  const Action<Giant()> a = ReturnGiant<
+      int, bool, double, 5, true, 6, char, unsigned, int, linked_ptr>(42);
+  Giant giant = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, giant.value);
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 value parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
+                AND_10_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9, v10)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + v5 + v6 + v7 + v8 + v9 + v10;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10ValueParameters) {
+  const Action<int()> a = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
+  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE and ACTION/ACTION_P* can be overloaded
+// on the number of value parameters.
+
+ACTION(ReturnSum) { return 0; }
+
+ACTION_P(ReturnSum, x) { return x; }
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
+                AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2;
+}
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
+                AND_3_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3;
+}
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number, int, k),
+                AND_4_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + k;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfValueParameters) {
+  const Action<int()> a0 = ReturnSum();
+  const Action<int()> a1 = ReturnSum(1);
+  const Action<int()> a2 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2);
+  const Action<int()> a3 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3);
+  const Action<int()> a4 = ReturnSum<int, 10000>(2000, 300, 40, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a0.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a2.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a3.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a4.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(pop)
+#endif
+
+}  // namespace gmock_generated_actions_test
+}  // namespace testing
author	Tobias Markmann <tm@ayena.de>	2017-01-10 20:22:26 (GMT)
committer	Tobias Markmann <tm@ayena.de>	2017-01-11 18:23:48 (GMT)
commit	3b0cde2e6dbf26a01a59b0004e4041199731cbc8 (patch)
tree	0b2ba6addb161f1d3e437a64685ea797341a149b /3rdParty/GoogleTest/src/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
parent	a0c339f80e4585341179edef1898defd21a0d36a (diff)
download	swift-3b0cde2e6dbf26a01a59b0004e4041199731cbc8.zip swift-3b0cde2e6dbf26a01a59b0004e4041199731cbc8.tar.bz2