1 files changed, 308 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3rdParty/Breakpad/src/common/simple_string_dictionary_unittest.cc b/3rdParty/Breakpad/src/common/simple_string_dictionary_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..34f4b9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3rdParty/Breakpad/src/common/simple_string_dictionary_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2008, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+#include "breakpad_googletest_includes.h"
+#include "common/simple_string_dictionary.h"
+
+namespace google_breakpad {
+
+TEST(NonAllocatingMapTest, Entry) {
+  typedef NonAllocatingMap<5, 9, 15> TestMap;
+  TestMap map;
+
+  const TestMap::Entry* entry = TestMap::Iterator(map).Next();
+  EXPECT_FALSE(entry);
+
+  // Try setting a key/value and then verify.
+  map.SetKeyValue("key1", "value1");
+  entry = TestMap::Iterator(map).Next();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(entry);
+  EXPECT_STREQ(entry->key, "key1");
+  EXPECT_STREQ(entry->value, "value1");
+
+  // Try setting a new value.
+  map.SetKeyValue("key1", "value3");
+  EXPECT_STREQ(entry->value, "value3");
+
+  // Make sure the key didn't change.
+  EXPECT_STREQ(entry->key, "key1");
+
+  // Clear the entry and verify the key and value are empty strings.
+  map.RemoveKey("key1");
+  EXPECT_FALSE(entry->is_active());
+  EXPECT_EQ(strlen(entry->key), 0u);
+  EXPECT_EQ(strlen(entry->value), 0u);
+}
+
+TEST(NonAllocatingMapTest, SimpleStringDictionary) {
+  // Make a new dictionary
+  SimpleStringDictionary dict;
+
+  // Set three distinct values on three keys
+  dict.SetKeyValue("key1", "value1");
+  dict.SetKeyValue("key2", "value2");
+  dict.SetKeyValue("key3", "value3");
+
+  EXPECT_NE(dict.GetValueForKey("key1"), "value1");
+  EXPECT_NE(dict.GetValueForKey("key2"), "value2");
+  EXPECT_NE(dict.GetValueForKey("key3"), "value3");
+  EXPECT_EQ(dict.GetCount(), 3u);
+  // try an unknown key
+  EXPECT_FALSE(dict.GetValueForKey("key4"));
+
+  // Remove a key
+  dict.RemoveKey("key3");
+
+  // Now make sure it's not there anymore
+  EXPECT_FALSE(dict.GetValueForKey("key3"));
+
+  // Remove by setting value to NULL
+  dict.SetKeyValue("key2", NULL);
+
+  // Now make sure it's not there anymore
+  EXPECT_FALSE(dict.GetValueForKey("key2"));
+}
+
+TEST(NonAllocatingMapTest, CopyAndAssign) {
+  NonAllocatingMap<10, 10, 10> map;
+  map.SetKeyValue("one", "a");
+  map.SetKeyValue("two", "b");
+  map.SetKeyValue("three", "c");
+  map.RemoveKey("two");
+  EXPECT_EQ(2u, map.GetCount());
+
+  // Test copy.
+  NonAllocatingMap<10, 10, 10> map_copy(map);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2u, map_copy.GetCount());
+  EXPECT_STREQ("a", map_copy.GetValueForKey("one"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("c", map_copy.GetValueForKey("three"));
+  map_copy.SetKeyValue("four", "d");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("d", map_copy.GetValueForKey("four"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(map.GetValueForKey("four"));
+
+  // Test assign.
+  NonAllocatingMap<10, 10, 10> map_assign;
+  map_assign = map;
+  EXPECT_EQ(2u, map_assign.GetCount());
+  EXPECT_STREQ("a", map_assign.GetValueForKey("one"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("c", map_assign.GetValueForKey("three"));
+  map_assign.SetKeyValue("four", "d");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("d", map_assign.GetValueForKey("four"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(map.GetValueForKey("four"));
+
+  map.RemoveKey("one");
+  EXPECT_FALSE(map.GetValueForKey("one"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("a", map_copy.GetValueForKey("one"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("a", map_assign.GetValueForKey("one"));
+}
+
+// Add a bunch of values to the dictionary, remove some entries in the middle,
+// and then add more.
+TEST(NonAllocatingMapTest, Iterator) {
+  SimpleStringDictionary* dict = new SimpleStringDictionary();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(dict);
+
+  char key[SimpleStringDictionary::key_size];
+  char value[SimpleStringDictionary::value_size];
+
+  const int kDictionaryCapacity = SimpleStringDictionary::num_entries;
+  const int kPartitionIndex = kDictionaryCapacity - 5;
+
+  // We assume at least this size in the tests below
+  ASSERT_GE(kDictionaryCapacity, 64);
+
+  // We'll keep track of the number of key/value pairs we think should
+  // be in the dictionary
+  int expectedDictionarySize = 0;
+
+  // Set a bunch of key/value pairs like key0/value0, key1/value1, ...
+  for (int i = 0; i < kPartitionIndex; ++i) {
+    sprintf(key, "key%d", i);
+    sprintf(value, "value%d", i);
+    dict->SetKeyValue(key, value);
+  }
+  expectedDictionarySize = kPartitionIndex;
+
+  // set a couple of the keys twice (with the same value) - should be nop
+  dict->SetKeyValue("key2", "value2");
+  dict->SetKeyValue("key4", "value4");
+  dict->SetKeyValue("key15", "value15");
+
+  // Remove some random elements in the middle
+  dict->RemoveKey("key7");
+  dict->RemoveKey("key18");
+  dict->RemoveKey("key23");
+  dict->RemoveKey("key31");
+  expectedDictionarySize -= 4;  // we just removed four key/value pairs
+
+  // Set some more key/value pairs like key59/value59, key60/value60, ...
+  for (int i = kPartitionIndex; i < kDictionaryCapacity; ++i) {
+    sprintf(key, "key%d", i);
+    sprintf(value, "value%d", i);
+    dict->SetKeyValue(key, value);
+  }
+  expectedDictionarySize += kDictionaryCapacity - kPartitionIndex;
+
+  // Now create an iterator on the dictionary
+  SimpleStringDictionary::Iterator iter(*dict);
+
+  // We then verify that it iterates through exactly the number of
+  // key/value pairs we expect, and that they match one-for-one with what we
+  // would expect.  The ordering of the iteration does not matter...
+
+  // used to keep track of number of occurrences found for key/value pairs
+  int count[kDictionaryCapacity];
+  memset(count, 0, sizeof(count));
+
+  int totalCount = 0;
+
+  const SimpleStringDictionary::Entry* entry;
+  while ((entry = iter.Next())) {
+    totalCount++;
+
+    // Extract keyNumber from a string of the form key<keyNumber>
+    int keyNumber;
+    sscanf(entry->key, "key%d", &keyNumber);
+
+    // Extract valueNumber from a string of the form value<valueNumber>
+    int valueNumber;
+    sscanf(entry->value, "value%d", &valueNumber);
+
+    // The value number should equal the key number since that's how we set them
+    EXPECT_EQ(keyNumber, valueNumber);
+
+    // Key and value numbers should be in proper range:
+    // 0 <= keyNumber < kDictionaryCapacity
+    bool isKeyInGoodRange =
+      (keyNumber >= 0 && keyNumber < kDictionaryCapacity);
+    bool isValueInGoodRange =
+      (valueNumber >= 0 && valueNumber < kDictionaryCapacity);
+    EXPECT_TRUE(isKeyInGoodRange);
+    EXPECT_TRUE(isValueInGoodRange);
+
+    if (isKeyInGoodRange && isValueInGoodRange) {
+      ++count[keyNumber];
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Make sure each of the key/value pairs showed up exactly one time, except
+  // for the ones which we removed.
+  for (size_t i = 0; i < kDictionaryCapacity; ++i) {
+    // Skip over key7, key18, key23, and key31, since we removed them
+    if (!(i == 7 || i == 18 || i == 23 || i == 31)) {
+      EXPECT_EQ(count[i], 1);
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Make sure the number of iterations matches the expected dictionary size.
+  EXPECT_EQ(totalCount, expectedDictionarySize);
+}
+
+
+TEST(NonAllocatingMapTest, AddRemove) {
+  NonAllocatingMap<5, 7, 6> map;
+  map.SetKeyValue("rob", "ert");
+  map.SetKeyValue("mike", "pink");
+  map.SetKeyValue("mark", "allays");
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(3u, map.GetCount());
+  EXPECT_STREQ("ert", map.GetValueForKey("rob"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("pink", map.GetValueForKey("mike"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("allays", map.GetValueForKey("mark"));
+
+  map.RemoveKey("mike");
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(2u, map.GetCount());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(map.GetValueForKey("mike"));
+
+  map.SetKeyValue("mark", "mal");
+  EXPECT_EQ(2u, map.GetCount());
+  EXPECT_STREQ("mal", map.GetValueForKey("mark"));
+
+  map.RemoveKey("mark");
+  EXPECT_EQ(1u, map.GetCount());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(map.GetValueForKey("mark"));
+}
+
+TEST(NonAllocatingMapTest, Serialize) {
+  typedef NonAllocatingMap<4, 5, 7> TestMap;
+  TestMap map;
+  map.SetKeyValue("one", "abc");
+  map.SetKeyValue("two", "def");
+  map.SetKeyValue("tre", "hig");
+
+  EXPECT_STREQ("abc", map.GetValueForKey("one"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("def", map.GetValueForKey("two"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hig", map.GetValueForKey("tre"));
+
+  const SerializedNonAllocatingMap* serialized;
+  size_t size = map.Serialize(&serialized);
+
+  SerializedNonAllocatingMap* serialized_copy =
+      reinterpret_cast<SerializedNonAllocatingMap*>(malloc(size));
+  ASSERT_TRUE(serialized_copy);
+  memcpy(serialized_copy, serialized, size);
+
+  TestMap deserialized(serialized_copy, size);
+  free(serialized_copy);
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(3u, deserialized.GetCount());
+  EXPECT_STREQ("abc", deserialized.GetValueForKey("one"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("def", deserialized.GetValueForKey("two"));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hig", deserialized.GetValueForKey("tre"));
+}
+
+// Running out of space shouldn't crash.
+TEST(NonAllocatingMapTest, OutOfSpace) {
+  NonAllocatingMap<3, 2, 2> map;
+  map.SetKeyValue("a", "1");
+  map.SetKeyValue("b", "2");
+  map.SetKeyValue("c", "3");
+  EXPECT_EQ(2u, map.GetCount());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(map.GetValueForKey("c"));
+}
+
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+
+TEST(NonAllocatingMapTest, NullKey) {
+  NonAllocatingMap<4, 6, 6> map;
+  ASSERT_DEATH(map.SetKeyValue(NULL, "hello"), "");
+
+  map.SetKeyValue("hi", "there");
+  ASSERT_DEATH(map.GetValueForKey(NULL), "");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("there", map.GetValueForKey("hi"));
+
+  ASSERT_DEATH(map.GetValueForKey(NULL), "");
+  map.RemoveKey("hi");
+  EXPECT_EQ(0u, map.GetCount());
+}
+
+#endif  // !NDEBUG
+
+}  // namespace google_breakpad